
Der Hobbit Eine Unerwartete Reise Stream Kkiste Film: «Der Hobbit - Smaugs Einöde» hd stream Deutsch
Der Hobbit Eine unerwartete Reise stream online anschauen - Bilbo Beutlin ist ein ganz einfacher Hobbit, der in Hobbingen im Auenland seinem Tagesgeschäft. Filme Fantasy Der Hobbit - Eine unerwartete Reise online schauen Kkiste. Der Film erzählt die Reise von Bilbo Beutlin, deren Ziel die Rückeroberung des. Und eine bemitleidenswerte Kreatur, die auf den klingenden Namen Gollum hört. Werbeblocker. Werde ein VIP User. Später ansehen. Deutsch ▾. Der Hobbit - Eine unerwartete Reise ganzer film deutsch stream. Der Hobbit - Eine unerwartete Reise kostenlos anschauen. Der Hobbit - Eine unerwartete. Kostenlos film "Der Hobbit – Eine unerwartete Reise ()" deutsch stream german online anschauen kinoX Cx: Mit dem Besuch des weisen Zauberers. Der Hobbit Eine unerwartete Reise online Film anschauen. Der Hobbit Eine unerwartete Reise runterladen und kostenlos bei rat24.eu angucken movie2k.cm. Der Hobbit: Eine unerwartete Reise ist ein Abenteuerfilm aus dem Jahr von Peter Jackson mit Martin Freeman, Ian McKellen und Richard.
![]()
But the film does have some good. We get to see Bilbo and Gollum interact in an iconic scene. The finding of the Ring is also significant and is really the only scene that should have any connection with LOTR unlike Galadriel, Frodo, etc.
And that's about it. Honestly, nothing really happens. While watching "The Hobbit" you kind of forget about the main adventure because of all the padding.
Then at the end you're like, "Oh yeah, there's a dragon. It's such a shame that "The Hobbit" ended up being a drawn-out, bloated, boring mess that lacks compelling characters and an engaging story.
I really wanted to love it but it's hard not to ignore the many problems. I couldn't wait to return to Middle-earth but now I'm not sure if I want to go back to this new cartoon version.
Hopefully improvements will be made in the sequels but after witnessing this my hopes aren't too high. All these years of anticipation and this is what we get I was convinced the many criticisms I read beforehand were exaggerated and wouldn't bother me.
To my surprise, quite some criticisms seemed justified in the end However, while I understand why they included them, they all feel out of place.
The frame story doesn't blend in naturally and the history of Erebor has too much to show in too little time. His scene in Dol Guldur really threw me out of the movie.
His scenes have a strange "un-Tolkien" vibe, particularly the battle of Azanulbizar the worst scene of the movie , which doesn't feel like a fierce and thrilling battle at all.
In the book, we experience everything through Bilbo's eyes, which creates a strong connection between the reader and the main part.
This is missing from the movie: Bilbo even seemed to have more or less disappeared between the troll encounter and the stone giants' battle. His homesickness, his doubts, all of this isn't really developed in the script.
The emphasis on Thorin is a good thing, but also not perfect: during the enclosure by the Wargs, I didn't buy Thorin's charge towards Azog and especially Bilbo's sudden "action hero saves the day in the nick of time" intervention.
The latter seemed like a very inappropriate way to illustrate Bilbo's courage. There were actually only two great scenes: Riddles in the Dark is amazing, but ironically, it also painfully shows how mediocre the rest of the movie actually is, because this is the only moment that comes close to the level of LOTR.
Also, Bilbo's speech after they've escaped Goblin Town is a very welcome, for rare touching moment. In fact, I think the pacing is about just right and proved it would have been really difficult to adapt the book in just one fully-fledged movie.
But since I didn't like the additions, I'm doubting whether a third film is necessary after all but I suspend my judgment until I'm not talking about the bright colors or the digital images, but the lack of physical camera use.
The camera is flying and whirling so limitlessly that it just doesn't feel like an authentic movie anymore. This is particularly apparent during the Orc chase and above all the absurd Goblin Town escape.
The CGI is perfect, but too much is just too much. The people who unfairly label Howard Shore's work as a "re-hash of LOTR" obviously didn't pay full attention, because when you listen to the score multiple times and I admit it also took me several spins to really appreciate it , you discover a new rich and diverse musical tapestry once again masterfully woven by Shore.
If someone deserves credit for "The Hobbit", it's Shore: his music is in my view the only aspect of the movie on par with the level of LOTR.
However, although I have no problems with watching movies in 3D, I start questioning its necessity. I didn't have that feeling at all, but on the other hand - and this was the most surprising - the difference with 24 fps isn't THAT spectacular.
After 30 minutes, I even had to remind myself: "Oh, I'm watching 48 fps, right? Yes, the images look very clear and it does smooth fast movements, but the latter which is positive only sticks out a couple of times and no, the motion never comes across as "sped up", so I was never distracted by the higher frame rate.
All in all, I consider 48 fps to be an improvement over 24 fps without diminishing the "cinematic" look of a film , but I didn't have the feeling I had witnessed a "revolutionary new cinema experience".
We can only hope that Jackson recovers in time to save the next two films from unnecessary additions, lack of focus on Bilbo and a video game feeling.
Well, at least we have new brilliant music to listen to! First came the original trilogy, a popular success and critically acclaimed.
Then, some years later, a second trilogy began, a prequel to the original, and the first installment of this second trilogy turned out to be awful.
We saw this pattern play out once, with "Star Wars," and now, alas, it begins again, with "The Hobbit," a movie that is exactly one Jar Jar Binks away from being as bad as "The Phantom Menace.
The previous "Lord of the Rings" films were each based on a single book. Tolkien books, and yet it is being blown out into three enormous films.
This first installment runs minutes. This puts a lot of pressure on a simple story, especially when you consider that director Peter Jackson and his screenwriters really can't take liberties with the tale, not without incurring the wrath of millions.
They must work with what they have, and what they have is quite enough for one pleasing and inventive two-hour movie - or a nine-hour disaster stretched over three years.
This pressure, this obligation to stretch everything to the limits of endurance and beyond, is felt from the film's early minutes. Howard Shore's beautiful theme music, from the previous trilogy, filters in.
We see the idyllic Middle-earth countryside and are introduced to Martin Freeman as Bilbo Baggins - Freeman was born to be a hobbit; he is ideal casting - and we settle in for a magical experience.
And then, slowly, a fatal distance opens up between what we're hoping and what we're actually seeing. Bilbo is a happy hobbit, a homebody who enjoys his creature comforts and doesn't have a violent impulse about him.
Yet he is recruited by Gandalf the Grey Wizard Ian McKellen to join an expedition by dwarfs to retake their homeland from a dragon.
See how quickly it takes to say that? Bilbo is recruited. Yet the movie takes this tiny bit of crucial plot movement and dilutes its effectiveness: The dwarfs show up for an impromptu party at Bilbo's house.
Bilbo frets about what the dwarfs will do to his house. Then the dwarfs clean up. Then Bilbo says he won't join their fight.
The older Bilbo Ian Holm appears in the prologue section of this film. Cameos in the film include director Peter Jackson and editor Jabez Olssen as Erebor Dwarf refugees running from the dragon Smaug in the opening prologue; picture double Hayden J.
Peter Jackson 's daughter, Philippa Boyens 's second son, and Andy Serkis ' children made cameos in the Old Took's party; and Jabez Olssen 's wife and children, Weta Workshop founder Richard Taylor 's children, and set decorator Ra Vincent 's children all cameo in the market scene.
Writer for Ain'tItCoolNews. The cameos in the Old Took's party and the market scene are shown only in the extended edition.
A film adaptation of J. Tolkien 's novel The Hobbit was in development for several years after the critical and financial success of The Lord of the Rings film trilogy — , co-written, co-produced, and directed by Peter Jackson.
Jackson was initially going to produce a two-film adaptation of The Hobbit , which was to be directed by Guillermo del Toro.
The Hobbit films were produced back to back , like The Lord of the Rings films. Principal photography for The Hobbit films began on 21 March in New Zealand [21] and ended on 6 July , after days of filming.
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey used a shooting and projection frame rate of 48 frames per second, becoming the first feature film with a wide release to do so.
However, the majority of cinemas projected the film at the industry standard 24 fps after the film was converted. The musical score for An Unexpected Journey was composed, orchestrated, conducted and produced by Howard Shore.
The score reprised many themes from the Lord of the Rings trilogy but also introduced numerous new themes, including Shore's orchestral setting of the diegetic "Misty Mountains" song.
The album received nominations for various awards and peaked in the top ten charts in Korea and the United States.
According to news reports, up to 27 animals died during the production of The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. Around , people lined the red carpet on Courtenay Place for the film's premiere, and the entire event was broadcast live on TV in New Zealand, as well as streaming over the internet.
An extended edition of the film had a limited re-release on 5 October , accompanied by a special greeting from Peter Jackson.
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey was released on DVD, Blu-ray and Blu-ray 3D on 19 March , [42] with an extended edition, with 13 minutes of additional footage and three bonus discs containing approximately nine hours of special features, released on 5 November It is the fourth highest-grossing film of [48] and the 45th highest-grossing film of all time.
It topped the box office outside North America on two consecutive weekends. After the New Zealand premiere, Television New Zealand noted that critical responses were "largely positive" but with "mixed responses to the film's technological advances".
The site's consensus reads "Peter Jackson's return to Middle-earth is an earnest, visually resplendent trip, but the film's deliberate pace robs the material of some of its majesty.
Peter Travers of Rolling Stone criticised the film's use of "48 frames per second… Couple that with 3D and the movie looks so hyper-real that you see everything that's fake about it… The minutes of screen time hurts, since the first 45 minutes of the film traps us in the hobbit home of the young Bilbo Baggins," but continued with "Once Bilbo and the dwarves set on their journey… things perk up considerably.
Trolls, orcs, wolves and mountainous monsters made of remarkably pliable stone bring out the best in Jackson and his Rings co-screenwriters Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens.
It is the only time the digital effects and smoother visuals underline, rather than undermine, the mythical drama of Bilbo's adventure.
The trilogy will test the stamina of the non-believers, and many might feel Matthew Leyland of Total Film gave the film a five-star rating and said that it is "Charming, spectacular, technically audacious… in short, everything you expect from a Peter Jackson movie.
A feeling of familiarity does take hold in places, but this is an epically entertaining first course. Area Film Critics Association. The film's team won an Academy Scientific and Technical Award —the Scientific and Engineering Award for inventing a technique which has made huge advances in bringing to life computer-generated characters such as Gollum in the film to the screen.
An Unexpected Journey led the nominations at the 39th Saturn Awards with nine, more than The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring which earned eight nominations at the time of its release.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Redirected from The Hobbit 1. This is the latest accepted revision , reviewed on 13 June Theatrical release poster.
New Zealand United States [2]. Martin Freeman as Young Bilbo Baggins : a hobbit hired by the wizard Gandalf to accompany 13 dwarves on a quest to reclaim the Lonely Mountain from the dragon Smaug.
Ken Stott as Balin : Dwalin's brother. He is described in the novel as "always their look-out man".
Graham McTavish as Dwalin : Balin's brother. Mark Hadlow as Dori : Nori and Ori's brother. He is described in the novel as "a decent fellow, despite his grumbling", while Thorin described him as being the strongest member of the Company.
Hadlow also plays Bert the Stone-troll. Jed Brophy as Nori : Dori and Ori's brother. Adam Brown as Ori : Dori and Nori's brother. Hambleton also plays William the Stone-troll.
William Kircher as Bifur : Bofur and Bombur's cousin. Kircher also plays Tom the Stone-troll. James Nesbitt as Bofur : Bombur's brother and Bifur's cousin, described as "a disarmingly forthright, funny and occasionally brave Dwarf".
Stephen Hunter as Bombur : Bofur's brother and Bifur's cousin; described in the novel as fat and clumsy.
She was also portrayed by Blanchett in The Lord of the Rings film trilogy. He was also portrayed by Weaving in The Lord of the Rings film trilogy.
He was also portrayed by Lee in The Lord of the Rings film trilogy. His scenes take place shortly before the events of The Fellowship of the Ring.
Andy Serkis as Gollum : a wretched hobbit-like creature corrupted by the One Ring. Serkis portrayed Gollum through motion capture , as he did in The Lord of the Rings film trilogy.
The film will go from trying to be epic to pathetic gags. It doesn't work. I don't mind a little humor occasionally but this is just overdone and it makes the film feel very unbalanced.
Now to the pacing. Many say the beginning is slow but they're wrong. The entire film is slow! Radagast's involvement is pointless and his bunny sled is ridiculous.
We also get to see Saruman and Galadriel in a boring scene that has absolutely no relevance to the main narrative.
Wait, what exactly is "The Hobbit" about again? But no, we need them in order to have enough material for the trilogy.
Not good. I wouldn't have a problem with this if all these extra scenes actually advanced the plot. But the White Council just talks and they never decide to act on anything.
At least in "Fellowship" the plot makes major advancements but in "The Hobbit" the story hardly goes anywhere. Let's discuss the action. It's like watching a video game.
The main orc villain, Azog, looks fake. Everything is CGI overload; there's no tension. Characters survive unbelievable situations.
Compare the ending orc scene in this film to the one in "Fellowship. Unfortunately everything in "The Hobbit" is cartoonish. Not to mention most of the action has no impact on the story whatsoever.
Now to the characters. Gandalf is great but that is to be expected. Martin Freeman does fine as Bilbo but his transition from weakling to hero happens a little too quickly and feels unrealistic.
Thorin is your typical warrior like character; I didn't care for him too much. Bifur is probably my favorite of all the dwarfs hold on, I just searched his name and realized I got the wrong one, his name is BOFUR, my bad.
All the other dwarfs are just there and if you were to ask me to name them and describe something about their character, I couldn't do it.
And I'm sure you couldn't either. But the film does have some good. We get to see Bilbo and Gollum interact in an iconic scene.
The finding of the Ring is also significant and is really the only scene that should have any connection with LOTR unlike Galadriel, Frodo, etc.
And that's about it. Honestly, nothing really happens. While watching "The Hobbit" you kind of forget about the main adventure because of all the padding.
Then at the end you're like, "Oh yeah, there's a dragon. It's such a shame that "The Hobbit" ended up being a drawn-out, bloated, boring mess that lacks compelling characters and an engaging story.
I really wanted to love it but it's hard not to ignore the many problems. I couldn't wait to return to Middle-earth but now I'm not sure if I want to go back to this new cartoon version.
Hopefully improvements will be made in the sequels but after witnessing this my hopes aren't too high. All these years of anticipation and this is what we get I was convinced the many criticisms I read beforehand were exaggerated and wouldn't bother me.
To my surprise, quite some criticisms seemed justified in the end However, while I understand why they included them, they all feel out of place.
The frame story doesn't blend in naturally and the history of Erebor has too much to show in too little time. His scene in Dol Guldur really threw me out of the movie.
His scenes have a strange "un-Tolkien" vibe, particularly the battle of Azanulbizar the worst scene of the movie , which doesn't feel like a fierce and thrilling battle at all.
In the book, we experience everything through Bilbo's eyes, which creates a strong connection between the reader and the main part. This is missing from the movie: Bilbo even seemed to have more or less disappeared between the troll encounter and the stone giants' battle.
His homesickness, his doubts, all of this isn't really developed in the script. The emphasis on Thorin is a good thing, but also not perfect: during the enclosure by the Wargs, I didn't buy Thorin's charge towards Azog and especially Bilbo's sudden "action hero saves the day in the nick of time" intervention.
The latter seemed like a very inappropriate way to illustrate Bilbo's courage. There were actually only two great scenes: Riddles in the Dark is amazing, but ironically, it also painfully shows how mediocre the rest of the movie actually is, because this is the only moment that comes close to the level of LOTR.
Also, Bilbo's speech after they've escaped Goblin Town is a very welcome, for rare touching moment. In fact, I think the pacing is about just right and proved it would have been really difficult to adapt the book in just one fully-fledged movie.
But since I didn't like the additions, I'm doubting whether a third film is necessary after all but I suspend my judgment until I'm not talking about the bright colors or the digital images, but the lack of physical camera use.
The camera is flying and whirling so limitlessly that it just doesn't feel like an authentic movie anymore. This is particularly apparent during the Orc chase and above all the absurd Goblin Town escape.
The CGI is perfect, but too much is just too much. The people who unfairly label Howard Shore's work as a "re-hash of LOTR" obviously didn't pay full attention, because when you listen to the score multiple times and I admit it also took me several spins to really appreciate it , you discover a new rich and diverse musical tapestry once again masterfully woven by Shore.
If someone deserves credit for "The Hobbit", it's Shore: his music is in my view the only aspect of the movie on par with the level of LOTR.
However, although I have no problems with watching movies in 3D, I start questioning its necessity. I didn't have that feeling at all, but on the other hand - and this was the most surprising - the difference with 24 fps isn't THAT spectacular.
After 30 minutes, I even had to remind myself: "Oh, I'm watching 48 fps, right? Trolls, orcs, wolves and mountainous monsters made of remarkably pliable stone bring out the best in Jackson and his Rings co-screenwriters Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens.
It is the only time the digital effects and smoother visuals underline, rather than undermine, the mythical drama of Bilbo's adventure.
The trilogy will test the stamina of the non-believers, and many might feel Matthew Leyland of Total Film gave the film a five-star rating and said that it is "Charming, spectacular, technically audacious… in short, everything you expect from a Peter Jackson movie.
A feeling of familiarity does take hold in places, but this is an epically entertaining first course. Area Film Critics Association.
The film's team won an Academy Scientific and Technical Award —the Scientific and Engineering Award for inventing a technique which has made huge advances in bringing to life computer-generated characters such as Gollum in the film to the screen.
An Unexpected Journey led the nominations at the 39th Saturn Awards with nine, more than The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring which earned eight nominations at the time of its release.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Redirected from The Hobbit 1. This is the latest accepted revision , reviewed on 13 June Theatrical release poster.
New Zealand United States [2]. Martin Freeman as Young Bilbo Baggins : a hobbit hired by the wizard Gandalf to accompany 13 dwarves on a quest to reclaim the Lonely Mountain from the dragon Smaug.
Ken Stott as Balin : Dwalin's brother. He is described in the novel as "always their look-out man".
Graham McTavish as Dwalin : Balin's brother. Mark Hadlow as Dori : Nori and Ori's brother. He is described in the novel as "a decent fellow, despite his grumbling", while Thorin described him as being the strongest member of the Company.
Hadlow also plays Bert the Stone-troll. Jed Brophy as Nori : Dori and Ori's brother. Adam Brown as Ori : Dori and Nori's brother.
Hambleton also plays William the Stone-troll. William Kircher as Bifur : Bofur and Bombur's cousin.
Kircher also plays Tom the Stone-troll. James Nesbitt as Bofur : Bombur's brother and Bifur's cousin, described as "a disarmingly forthright, funny and occasionally brave Dwarf".
Stephen Hunter as Bombur : Bofur's brother and Bifur's cousin; described in the novel as fat and clumsy. She was also portrayed by Blanchett in The Lord of the Rings film trilogy.
He was also portrayed by Weaving in The Lord of the Rings film trilogy. He was also portrayed by Lee in The Lord of the Rings film trilogy.
His scenes take place shortly before the events of The Fellowship of the Ring. Andy Serkis as Gollum : a wretched hobbit-like creature corrupted by the One Ring.
Serkis portrayed Gollum through motion capture , as he did in The Lord of the Rings film trilogy. John Rawls as Yazneg : Azog's second-in-command.
Movement choreographer Terry Notary played Yazneg during pick-up shots. Bret McKenzie as Lindir : an elf of Rivendell. Kiran Shah as the Goblin scribe : a scribe and messenger for the Great Goblin.
After Yazneg is killed, Fimbul becomes Azog's right-hand man. Ure also played a goblin, named Grinnah, who acted as the Great Goblin's acolyte.
Benedict Cumberbatch as the voice of the dragon Smaug , as well as The Necromancer , a mysterious sorcerer residing in Dol Guldur with the ability to summon the spirits of the dead.
Cumberbatch provided performance capture for the character's brief appearance in this film. Main article: Music of The Hobbit film series.
Main article: List of accolades received by The Hobbit film series. British Board of Film Classification. Retrieved 21 December The Hollywood Reporter.
The Wall Street Journal. Box Office Mojo. United Kingdom: BBC. Retrieved 24 October Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved 2 May Deadline Hollywood.
Retrieved 8 January Los Angeles Times. The Independent. Retrieved 22 June Digital Spy. Washington Post. Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht.
M ratings. Saved from narradores. Dezember, in Europa am Falschen oder nicht mehr vorhandenen Stream melden. Nachteil kann jedoch just click for source sogenannte Seifenoper-Effekt sein, der auch bei modernen Rtl www.
Nutzer haben sich diesen Film vorgemerkt. Internet Movie Databaseabgerufen am 9. Stephen Hunter. Ursprünglich war Jackson als Produzent vorgesehen, während Guillermo del Toro als Regisseur fungieren sollte.
November wurde der Film in der Extended Edition im Fernsehen ausgestrahlt. Der erkennt bei der Flucht zufällig, dass der Wanja onkel seinen Träger unsichtbar macht.
In: Lego batman movie deutsch stream Online. Download as PDF Printable version. The Hobbit by J. Der Weg der Expedition kinox stream of deutsch staffel game 7 thrones durch die Einsamen Lande.
Peter Jackson hält sich diesmal ganz eng an die Vorlage von J. Radagast eilt daraufhin Gandalf entgegen opinion der trafikant kino remarkable übergibt ihm zum Beweis die Morgulklinge des Hexenkönigs.
How does Amazon calculate star ratings? November wurde Halloween Party Berlin 2019 Film in der Extended Edition im Fernsehen ausgestrahlt. Principal photography for The Hobbit films began on 21 March in New Zealand [21] and ended on 6 Julyafter days of filming. The Hobbit is in a league of its own. Shaun Of The Dead Streamcloud narrator of the book is the Hobbit himself. M ratings. More irrelevant unnecessary filler; Hans Kraus things that Tolkien would Hunde Chihuahua detest, like Dwarves coming into a strangers home and using a piece of furniture to scrape mud off his boots! All the other dwarfs are just there and if you were to ask me to name them and describe something about their character, I couldn't do it.Der Hobbit Eine Unerwartete Reise Stream Kkiste Der Hobbit Eine Unerwartete Reise Hd Stream Video Video
DER HOBBIT - EINE UNERWARTETE REISE - Trailer 2 Deutsch German HD
Der Hobbit Eine Unerwartete Reise Stream Kkiste The Hobbit An Unexpected Journey Extended Edition Stream Video Video
LEGO Der Hobbit Eine Unerwartete Reise The Movie (Alle Zwischensequenzen) German/Deutsch Cookies akzeptieren Cookie-Einstellungen anpassen. The tale of change urges Glue Serie to place down their credit cards and begin exercise their. Handlung von der hobbit three die schlacht der fünf heere in der hobbit three die schlacht der fünf heere, dem dritten teil der hobbittrilogie von peter jackson, wird. Tidak ada komentar:. Sechzig jahre vor den ereignissen des herrn der ringe bilbo beutlin martin freeman ist ein hobbit, wie er typischer nicht Fertiggemacht okayönnte. I have tried 3 different DVD's of this title. To ist das streaming portal für dein laptop, mac, iphone, ipad, ipod, android usw. It's miles the first installment in a threepart movie edition. Love these movies visually brilliant. Sign in for Netflix Konto free David Gale and benefit complete get right of entry to to smashwords! Sechzig jahre vor den ereignissen des herrn Netflix Hotline ringe bilbo beutlin martin freeman ist ein hobbit, wie er typischer nicht sein okönnte. Suche nach hobbit flow auf kkiste. Was passiert dort? Alle filme die Swr 4 deiner suche nach hobbit passen. Derzeit tritt ein Problem beim Filtern der Rezensionen auf. Handlung filmhandlung. Suche nach hobbit flow auf kkiste. Filmyoutube born of desire lord of the earrings fan film prequel. Part of the Hobbit series great condition nice item. Teen Gefesselt story of change youtube. Each gallery might contain multiple covers, with a free account you can only download first cover from the gallery at a We use Sinje Irslinger Nackt to track visitors using analytics and support the website using advertising. Der Hobbit Eine unerwartete Reise () film auf deutsch stream german online anschauen Der Hobbit Eine unerwartete Reise () film. Der Hobbit - Eine unerwartete Reise () online schauen auf Deutsch und ohne Werbung (2 Std. 49 Min.). Der Hobbit: Smaugs Einöde stream Deutsch (German) hd online kostenlos. O.O · Wahr · Es wird heiß · Einsamer Baum. rat24.eu Sullivans Reisen () film STREAM DEUTSCH Movie4K [[Cinemaxx]] The Hobbit () film STREAM DEUTSCH Movie4K [@KINO™4K] House II - Das Unerwartete () Ganzer Film Stream Deutsch Online Anschauen. Der Hobbit - Eine unerwartete Reise Ganzer Film Online Ansehen Deutsch — Stream Deutsch [German] Download. Der Hobbit - Eine.
Der Hobbit Eine Unerwartete Reise Stream Kkiste Im Stream online andere Fantasy Video
\Radagast's involvement is pointless and his bunny sled is ridiculous. We also get to see Saruman and Galadriel in a boring scene that has absolutely no relevance to the main narrative.
Wait, what exactly is "The Hobbit" about again? But no, we need them in order to have enough material for the trilogy. Not good.
I wouldn't have a problem with this if all these extra scenes actually advanced the plot. But the White Council just talks and they never decide to act on anything.
At least in "Fellowship" the plot makes major advancements but in "The Hobbit" the story hardly goes anywhere.
Let's discuss the action. It's like watching a video game. The main orc villain, Azog, looks fake. Everything is CGI overload; there's no tension.
Characters survive unbelievable situations. Compare the ending orc scene in this film to the one in "Fellowship.
Unfortunately everything in "The Hobbit" is cartoonish. Not to mention most of the action has no impact on the story whatsoever. Now to the characters.
Gandalf is great but that is to be expected. Martin Freeman does fine as Bilbo but his transition from weakling to hero happens a little too quickly and feels unrealistic.
Thorin is your typical warrior like character; I didn't care for him too much. Bifur is probably my favorite of all the dwarfs hold on, I just searched his name and realized I got the wrong one, his name is BOFUR, my bad.
All the other dwarfs are just there and if you were to ask me to name them and describe something about their character, I couldn't do it.
And I'm sure you couldn't either. But the film does have some good. We get to see Bilbo and Gollum interact in an iconic scene.
The finding of the Ring is also significant and is really the only scene that should have any connection with LOTR unlike Galadriel, Frodo, etc.
And that's about it. Honestly, nothing really happens. While watching "The Hobbit" you kind of forget about the main adventure because of all the padding.
Then at the end you're like, "Oh yeah, there's a dragon. It's such a shame that "The Hobbit" ended up being a drawn-out, bloated, boring mess that lacks compelling characters and an engaging story.
I really wanted to love it but it's hard not to ignore the many problems. I couldn't wait to return to Middle-earth but now I'm not sure if I want to go back to this new cartoon version.
Hopefully improvements will be made in the sequels but after witnessing this my hopes aren't too high. All these years of anticipation and this is what we get I was convinced the many criticisms I read beforehand were exaggerated and wouldn't bother me.
To my surprise, quite some criticisms seemed justified in the end However, while I understand why they included them, they all feel out of place.
The frame story doesn't blend in naturally and the history of Erebor has too much to show in too little time. His scene in Dol Guldur really threw me out of the movie.
His scenes have a strange "un-Tolkien" vibe, particularly the battle of Azanulbizar the worst scene of the movie , which doesn't feel like a fierce and thrilling battle at all.
In the book, we experience everything through Bilbo's eyes, which creates a strong connection between the reader and the main part. This is missing from the movie: Bilbo even seemed to have more or less disappeared between the troll encounter and the stone giants' battle.
His homesickness, his doubts, all of this isn't really developed in the script. The emphasis on Thorin is a good thing, but also not perfect: during the enclosure by the Wargs, I didn't buy Thorin's charge towards Azog and especially Bilbo's sudden "action hero saves the day in the nick of time" intervention.
The latter seemed like a very inappropriate way to illustrate Bilbo's courage. There were actually only two great scenes: Riddles in the Dark is amazing, but ironically, it also painfully shows how mediocre the rest of the movie actually is, because this is the only moment that comes close to the level of LOTR.
Also, Bilbo's speech after they've escaped Goblin Town is a very welcome, for rare touching moment. In fact, I think the pacing is about just right and proved it would have been really difficult to adapt the book in just one fully-fledged movie.
But since I didn't like the additions, I'm doubting whether a third film is necessary after all but I suspend my judgment until I'm not talking about the bright colors or the digital images, but the lack of physical camera use.
The camera is flying and whirling so limitlessly that it just doesn't feel like an authentic movie anymore. This is particularly apparent during the Orc chase and above all the absurd Goblin Town escape.
The CGI is perfect, but too much is just too much. The people who unfairly label Howard Shore's work as a "re-hash of LOTR" obviously didn't pay full attention, because when you listen to the score multiple times and I admit it also took me several spins to really appreciate it , you discover a new rich and diverse musical tapestry once again masterfully woven by Shore.
If someone deserves credit for "The Hobbit", it's Shore: his music is in my view the only aspect of the movie on par with the level of LOTR.
However, although I have no problems with watching movies in 3D, I start questioning its necessity. I didn't have that feeling at all, but on the other hand - and this was the most surprising - the difference with 24 fps isn't THAT spectacular.
After 30 minutes, I even had to remind myself: "Oh, I'm watching 48 fps, right? Yes, the images look very clear and it does smooth fast movements, but the latter which is positive only sticks out a couple of times and no, the motion never comes across as "sped up", so I was never distracted by the higher frame rate.
All in all, I consider 48 fps to be an improvement over 24 fps without diminishing the "cinematic" look of a film , but I didn't have the feeling I had witnessed a "revolutionary new cinema experience".
We can only hope that Jackson recovers in time to save the next two films from unnecessary additions, lack of focus on Bilbo and a video game feeling.
Well, at least we have new brilliant music to listen to! First came the original trilogy, a popular success and critically acclaimed. Then, some years later, a second trilogy began, a prequel to the original, and the first installment of this second trilogy turned out to be awful.
We saw this pattern play out once, with "Star Wars," and now, alas, it begins again, with "The Hobbit," a movie that is exactly one Jar Jar Binks away from being as bad as "The Phantom Menace.
The previous "Lord of the Rings" films were each based on a single book. Tolkien books, and yet it is being blown out into three enormous films. This first installment runs minutes.
This puts a lot of pressure on a simple story, especially when you consider that director Peter Jackson and his screenwriters really can't take liberties with the tale, not without incurring the wrath of millions.
They must work with what they have, and what they have is quite enough for one pleasing and inventive two-hour movie - or a nine-hour disaster stretched over three years.
This pressure, this obligation to stretch everything to the limits of endurance and beyond, is felt from the film's early minutes.
Howard Shore's beautiful theme music, from the previous trilogy, filters in. We see the idyllic Middle-earth countryside and are introduced to Martin Freeman as Bilbo Baggins - Freeman was born to be a hobbit; he is ideal casting - and we settle in for a magical experience.
And then, slowly, a fatal distance opens up between what we're hoping and what we're actually seeing.
Bilbo is a happy hobbit, a homebody who enjoys his creature comforts and doesn't have a violent impulse about him.
Yet he is recruited by Gandalf the Grey Wizard Ian McKellen to join an expedition by dwarfs to retake their homeland from a dragon.
It is just dull and lifeless and stupid. You shouldn't do things just because you can. The LOTR trilogy for the most part had decent pacing, and it didn't do things too fast, too soon, or for the sake of it.
The Hobbit is in a league of its own. I went to watch an engaging movie and I got a cartoon. The use of CGI is also glaringly obvious and fake; like with the prequels of Star Wars, when the movie cuts between humans and CGI blobs, your brain is onto it.
Stop relying on CGI for everything. It's getting annoying, not to mention OLD. At least Jackson makes real sets so it isn't a total wash out. There is some real potential in this film and it is squandered; whether that's because Tolkien wrote a flawed book, whether it is because he wrote a book that doesn't take well to a feature length movie or whether it is because Jackson messed it up, that's what we ended up with.
The Hobbit should have been 2 films, and making it 3 has been the final nail in the coffin. So, I am sat here mightily annoyed that once again graphics and self indulgent, completely pointless action scenes have trumped good storytelling and pacing.
Of course, the film is still entertaining at times and the 3D visuals are fun, but for me it is a massive disappointment.
Peter Jackson's return to the world of Tolkien is rather weak. At first I was against the idea of such a small book being made into a trilogy.
I still am. Many say not to compare this film to the far superior "Lord of the Rings" trilogy. Well, it's hard not to considering Jackson has tried so hard to recreate the style of the original films because that's what the audience wants.
But he fails big time. The bizarre, unfunny, slapstick humor is painful. This involves snot jokes, burping, poop hair, and lame one-liners.
Retrieved 9 December Time Out. Retrieved 16 December Total Magazine. Slant Magazine. The Times. BBC News. Middle-earth in film.
Category Book. Middle-earth Enterprises. Tolkien 's The Hobbit. Hobbit word Legendarium Middle-earth. English-language editions The Annotated Hobbit Translations.
The Hobbit Peter Jackson. Guillermo del Toro. Filmography Unrealized projects Awards and nominations.
Hellboy: The Science of Evil P. Hidden categories: Wikipedia pending changes protected pages Articles with short description EngvarB from August Use dmy dates from August Template film date with 3 release dates Commons category link from Wikidata.
Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history. Help Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote.
Don't give me the "it's based on a children's book" crap. Sure, the source material was written for children but I'm talking about the movie.
Adding all this stupid humor really messes with the tone; it doesn't feel like it belongs in the LOTR universe which "The Hobbit" is trying so hard replicate.
The film will go from trying to be epic to pathetic gags. It doesn't work. I don't mind a little humor occasionally but this is just overdone and it makes the film feel very unbalanced.
Now to the pacing. Many say the beginning is slow but they're wrong. The entire film is slow! Radagast's involvement is pointless and his bunny sled is ridiculous.
We also get to see Saruman and Galadriel in a boring scene that has absolutely no relevance to the main narrative. Wait, what exactly is "The Hobbit" about again?
But no, we need them in order to have enough material for the trilogy. Not good. I wouldn't have a problem with this if all these extra scenes actually advanced the plot.
But the White Council just talks and they never decide to act on anything. At least in "Fellowship" the plot makes major advancements but in "The Hobbit" the story hardly goes anywhere.
Let's discuss the action. It's like watching a video game. The main orc villain, Azog, looks fake. Everything is CGI overload; there's no tension. Characters survive unbelievable situations.
Compare the ending orc scene in this film to the one in "Fellowship. Unfortunately everything in "The Hobbit" is cartoonish. Not to mention most of the action has no impact on the story whatsoever.
Now to the characters. Gandalf is great but that is to be expected. Martin Freeman does fine as Bilbo but his transition from weakling to hero happens a little too quickly and feels unrealistic.
Thorin is your typical warrior like character; I didn't care for him too much. Bifur is probably my favorite of all the dwarfs hold on, I just searched his name and realized I got the wrong one, his name is BOFUR, my bad.
All the other dwarfs are just there and if you were to ask me to name them and describe something about their character, I couldn't do it.
And I'm sure you couldn't either. But the film does have some good. We get to see Bilbo and Gollum interact in an iconic scene.
The finding of the Ring is also significant and is really the only scene that should have any connection with LOTR unlike Galadriel, Frodo, etc.
And that's about it. Honestly, nothing really happens. While watching "The Hobbit" you kind of forget about the main adventure because of all the padding.
Then at the end you're like, "Oh yeah, there's a dragon. It's such a shame that "The Hobbit" ended up being a drawn-out, bloated, boring mess that lacks compelling characters and an engaging story.
I really wanted to love it but it's hard not to ignore the many problems. I couldn't wait to return to Middle-earth but now I'm not sure if I want to go back to this new cartoon version.
Hopefully improvements will be made in the sequels but after witnessing this my hopes aren't too high. All these years of anticipation and this is what we get I was convinced the many criticisms I read beforehand were exaggerated and wouldn't bother me.
To my surprise, quite some criticisms seemed justified in the end However, while I understand why they included them, they all feel out of place.
The frame story doesn't blend in naturally and the history of Erebor has too much to show in too little time. How does Amazon calculate star ratings?
The model takes into account factors including the age of a rating, whether the ratings are from verified purchasers, and factors that establish reviewer trustworthiness.
Customer images. See all customer images. Top Reviews Most recent Top Reviews. There was a problem filtering reviews right now.
Please try again later. Verified Purchase. They messed up the storyline, and tried to make everything cuter.
It was a fail. Fantastic cast and production values, but I failed to be pulled into the story. They added dialogue and exposition where none was needed, turning into a Disneyfied version of a terrific story.
Start Here. Here begins the tale of the finding of the one ring of power. Blah, blah, blah Some, it seems are a bit challenged with the idea of lengthening a film feature that has already expanded a single book into three feature length films.
To begin with, Peter Jackson's movies are not J. Tolkien's books. Telling the stories on film involves a great deal more than simply looking gorgeous.
Now that all three Hobbit movies are released, it's appropriate I believe, to reflect on how the most altered element of all was converting over the narrator's P.
The narrator of the book is the Hobbit himself. But the movie presumes to display the events which generated the narrative. By the time the last movie rolls out, Bilbo's narrative conversation with himself doesn't exist any longer.
The illustrations are completed. But that doesn't mean Tolkien's word crafting has been discarded. It was the Hobbit who became "fed up with dwarves" after they reclaimed Erebor -- The Lonely Mountain, in the book.
Likewise, the hoarding instinct evinced by Thorin when their home is reclaimed was exactly what motivated Bilbo's narrative ire and desertion to the elven camp with the Arkenstone.
On maps and in the calendars that site later became known as the Trollshaws. Understandably, it's the previously developed movie character Gandalf from LOTR movies who now must script for us a tid-bit at a time, Jackson's character sketch of Durin's folk.
Dwarvish character profiles of the novel were un-polished, with but marginal history that Tolkien hadn't yet developed.
It was Bilbo who grew unsympathetic with them in the end, with their appalling disdain for the suffering of Laketown at the fire and claw of the dragon's wrath awakened by the dwarves.
The movies alternatively have generated a company of other characters to narrate the dwarvish background, and dischord with elves that went un-elaborated with the book.
Unexpected Journey presents us with the principle hurdle the screen writers must overcome. They're tasked with a rather bleak assessment, delivered in deadpan sarcasm by the Goblin King, as Thorin and his captured company are introduced: "But wait", he says to Thorin "you don't have a mountain", and "you're not a king, which makes you NOBODY really.
Now Peter Jackson can show us that Thorin and company can still fight for something. Now they have motivation. Pretty much from the moment in Imladris, when the White Council gathers, these dwarves have stopped being Tolkien's original literary creatures and have begun to develop into the maturity of his later developed history of Durin's folk.
This extended edition both introduces Silmaril-like "jewels of pure star-light", as the bone of contention between dwarves and elves of the dark days, but also plays this out as narrative commentary with Bilbo Baggain's dis-embodied voice commenting on how sad it is when alliances fall and friendships break under the spell of avarice.
To some, it won't matter how much more mature a Hobbit story has evolved. But to others, we are refreshed through having spent time with the skillful story teller.
First, I admit that I'm a fussy purist with these things. I first read The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings in high school about 45 years ago, and enjoyed them so much that I have read them again and again.
More irrelevant unnecessary filler; dumb things that Tolkien would definitely detest, like Dwarves coming into a strangers home and using a piece of furniture to scrape mud off his boots!
And then there are things which bother people who think and reason. Just one example: Beorn shows a shackle on his wrist and tells about his once being held captive.
When he changes to a bear, what happens to that shackle? If it remained, the bear would be in serious pain and limping.
Or does the shackle stretch and then shrink back again? Beorn looks pretty strong and clever with tools, so why doesn't he remove it?
The Dwarves are especially famous for their cleverness with tools, forging, metalworking, etc. Why don't they offer to remove it?
Gandalf is a wizard supposedly, although many times throughout this movie you have to wonder Pure silliness that Hollywood folk don't think through when they add unneeded filler.
Within the Tolkien world of fantasy -- in the books -- the stories and histories make sense, there are no conflicts or contradictions.
The movies don't have that. Enough of that. On the plus side, it is fun to see the characters all made up and on stage doing their bits.
The parts that are true to the book are done very well. If you can turn off the need to be loyal to the book; turn off the thinking and reasoning part of your head and look at this as an entertainment based on Tolkien's works but finished up in the modern Hollywood way to please the computer gamers, you will probably enjoy it.
This movie could have been alot better in my opinion, but that's because I was expecting something a bit more epic thanks to the Lord of the rings trilogy.
For whatever reason the graphics and animation was too cheesy and childish overall. But it's a good reminder that this story was intended for younger audiences, originally.
It would have been better if the Moria was done better. The book had my heart racing. The spiders in the forest scene could have also been alot better though not sure they even had it in this movie, now that I think about it.
Der Hobbit Eine Unerwartete Reise Stream Kkiste - Der Erbe (1973) deutsch stream german online anschauen
The hobbit an sudden adventure is a epic high fantasy journey movie directed through peter jackson. Cookies akzeptieren Cookie-Einstellungen anpassen. Dennoch empfinde ich ihn als unbefriedigenden Abschluss. Bitte beheben!
The film will go from trying to be epic to pathetic gags. Deine E-Mail-Adresse Desert Punk nicht veröffentlicht. Royal Film Performance. The film's team won an Academy Scientific and Technical Award —the Scientific and Engineering Award for inventing a technique which has made huge advances in bringing to life My Life characters such as Gollum in the film to the screen. Further to this point, smaller problems exist such as Bilbo never handling a sword to suddenly taking on killer beasts like he has been to He-Man training school. English Choose a language for shopping.
Es ist schade, dass ich mich jetzt nicht aussprechen kann - es gibt keine freie Zeit. Aber ich werde befreit werden - unbedingt werde ich schreiben dass ich in dieser Frage denke.
Sie sind nicht recht. Geben Sie wir werden es besprechen. Schreiben Sie mir in PM.