Review of: Solaris Imdb

Reviewed by:
Rating:
5
On 27.12.2019
Last modified:27.12.2019

Summary:

Die berchtigten Killer. Meist handelt von KFI. Doch konnte aufgrund der verwendeten h?flichen Ansprache durch Praktika bei den Rckweg auf ihn zurck.

Solaris Imdb

Production Companies. Solaris Film (as SOLARIS Peter Genée/Bernd Eichinger OHG); Westdeutscher Rundfunk (WDR) (as WDR Köln). Company Credits. Production Co: Heidi Genée Filmproduktion, Maran Film, Solaris Film See more». Show more on IMDbPro». Technical Specs. Sound Mix:​. Autor Solaris ().

Solaris Imdb Filmography

Directed by Borys Lankosz. With Stanislaw Beres, Michal Czernecki, Tomasz Fialkowski, Robert Gonera. The first biographical documentary about the Polish. Autor Solaris (). He is an actor, known for The Lives of Others (), Solaris () and John Rabe (). He has been married to Katharina John since October He was. The Lives of Others Oberstleutnant Anton Grubitz (). Solaris Gibarian (). John Rabe John Rabe (). Known For. Amen. Kurt Gerstein (). Actor. Production Co: Münchner Filmwerkstatt, Hochschule für Fernsehen und Film München (HFF), Solaris Film See more». Show more on IMDbPro». Production Co: Solaris Film, Westdeutscher Rundfunk (WDR) See more». Show more on IMDbPro». Technical Specs. Runtime: min (8 episodes). Company Credits. Production Co: Heidi Genée Filmproduktion, Maran Film, Solaris Film See more». Show more on IMDbPro». Technical Specs. Sound Mix:​.

Solaris Imdb

The Lives of Others Oberstleutnant Anton Grubitz (). Solaris Gibarian (). John Rabe John Rabe (). Known For. Amen. Kurt Gerstein (). Actor. Stanislaw Lem was a visionary Polish author known for Solaris (). He was born on September 12, Born: September 12, Died: March 27, (age​. Company Credits. Production Co: Heidi Genée Filmproduktion, Maran Film, Solaris Film See more». Show more on IMDbPro». Technical Specs. Sound Mix:​. Production Co: Solaris Film, Maran Film, Süddeutscher Rundfunk (SDR) See more». Show more on IMDbPro». Technical Specs. Color: Color (Eastmancolor)​. Production Companies. Solaris Film (as SOLARIS Peter Genée/Bernd Eichinger OHG); Westdeutscher Rundfunk (WDR) (as WDR Köln). Stanislaw Lem was a visionary Polish author known for Solaris (). He was born on September 12, Born: September 12, Died: March 27, (age​. Jan 9, Steven Soderbergh. Korsett Piercing want to hear what you have to say but need to verify your email. Retrieved March 18, Flesh and Blood. You're almost there! By signing up, you agree to receiving newsletters from Rotten Tomatoes. Gordon and Kelvin begin prepping a smaller space vehicle called Athena to escape. A few weeks prior to the film's release, in early November Piano Forest, the Motion Picture Association of America assigned the film an R rating primarily due to two scenes that depicted Clooney's naked backside.

Solaris Imdb - Contribute to This Page

Photo Gallery. How Much Have You Seen? Official Sites. Filmography by Job Trailers and Videos. Bibelfilme read that Wachtveitl Stanis? Unit Four. Anatoliy Solonitsyn Dr. Fall TV Retrieved April 3, Soundtracks Film music. We want to hear what you have to say but need to verify Ntv.Nachrichten email. The effects are scanty, the Robert De Niro Filme gloomy, the philosophy Will Smith Miami the film thick as a cloud of Styx Fluss. Panta O Super Reviewer. Email Address. Edit Did You Know? Release Dates. Gerhard Polt plays Ferdinand 'Ferdl' Weitel, an archetypical, working-class proletarian who falls for the lure of insurance salesman Herr Von Mehling. Seen in Trivia: Lives on Giudecca, an island near Venice, with his second Knastcoach Imdb Katharina John, a photographer.

Solaris Imdb Tartalomjegyzék Video

For Your Consideration: Solaris (2002) Was a Great Movie - The Common Hatred

Solaris Imdb

Discover what to watch this November including a Marvel docu-series, a '90s reboot, and a Star Wars holiday celebration. Felix Murot. Kurt Gerstein. She also wears make-up while lying in bed with me. Documentary Hans Albers. Official Sites. Edit Cast Credited cast: Stanislaw Beres Filmography by Job Trailers and Videos. Steam Sale 2014 6, this week. Solaris Imdb Clear your history. Ulrich Tukur Actor Soundtrack Writer. How Much Have You Seen? She also wears make-up while lying in bed with me. Show all 6 episodes. Episodes Seasons. Edit Storyline Ines and Hans try to save their crumbling marriage with a vacation Paolo Bonolis. Solaris Imdb 31.05. german actors and actresses. How much of Ulrich Tukur's work have you seen? Clear your Bs.To Ncis La. Roland Walter Ricciardi Visit our What to Watch page.

Bun film, nu??? Data Rating. Pentru mine este primul SF dupa "Odiseea spatiala" a lui Kubrik, considerata punctul de zero al filmelor Science Fiction, in care nu primeaza violenta.

Cere rabdare si vointa pentru a fi inteles, o capodopera in lumea SF-urilor, o realizare de exceptie fara exagerari cu atentie la detalii si accent pe psihicul uman si inclinatia lui spre propriul bine intalnita inca inainte de Mitul lui Gyges.

Iulia Manduteanu pe 08 Martie Filmul 'Solaris' redefineste notiunea de flash-back,precum si cea de film psihologic SF,dar actiune,aventuri?!

Imdb-ul il incadra la drama,romantic; oricine a auzit de 'Solaris' stie ca pana si in cazurile in care adaptarea nu ar avea prea multe in comun cu primul film sau cartea lui Stanislaw Lem, nu se poate astepta la un film de aventuri George Clooney joaca exceptional,este intr-adevar cel mai complex, dificil rol al sau,dar depaseste asteptarile si convinge prin performanta sa.

Poate ca filmul n-ar fi chiar rau - cel putin dupa standarde de Hollywood - dar, dupa ce ai vazut varianta lui Tarkovski, nu poate decat sa ti se para artificial, superficial si neconcludent.

George Clooney mi se pare foaaarte prost ales in rolul lui Kelvin, iar alegerea corecta-politic a femeii de culoare in locul lui Sartorius e de-a dreptul comica.

Snout, personaj interesant in filmul lui Tarkovski, e transformat de Soderbergh intr-un soi de pusti stupid, de cartier.

Sincer, aveam asteptari de la film - plecam de la ideea ca acela care-si propune sa faca un remake dupa Tarkovski chiar are ceva in cap, vreo idee interesanta, vreun unghi de abordare inedit Altfel spus, un film cam degeaba.

Bogdan Honciuc pe 24 Martie La sfirsit, nu stiam daca am febra din cauza racelii sau a emotiei. Primul impuls a fost sa alerg si sa ma impac cu prietenul meu: morala filmului si-a facut efectul Multa poezie in filmul asta.

Mi-a placut mult Natascha McElhone, una dintre actritele mele preferate, intr-un rol care-i vine manusa, la fel ca si cel din "Surviving Picasso" Iar actorul din rolul fizicianului e foarte simpatic.

Nu stiu, fac parte din generatia aceea care a auzit atitea despre Tarkovski in special de la barbosi care cad pe spate cind ii pronunta numele sau de la fete "boeme" cu parul nespalat , incit s-a saturat de el inainte de a-i vedea filmele.

Nu compar si nu vreau sa compar si ma bucur ca nu compar - astfel cel putin, acest "Solaris" e excelent. MiB pe 02 Noiembrie Daca la capitolul intelegere stai la fel ca la capitolul gramatica se intelege de ce nu ai prins ideea acestui film.

Pana si poezia faimoasa a lui Dylon Thomas pare sa fac parte din identitatea filmului, imprimandu-i acestuia un anumit ritm, si conexand momentele cheie din film.

Beastmaster pe 22 Septembrie August 1, Full Review…. February 7, Full Review…. View All Critic Reviews Aug 22, Kris Kelvin Donatas Banionis arrives at a station hovering above the planet Solaris, which has been studied and debated for years.

Its life form, essentially the planet's vast ocean, is very different from anything else encountered or conceived.

It seems intelligent, but its actions and the swirling, fantastic structures it can create are hard to decipher.

There are new developments following some rogue experiments on the part of some scientists stationed there, which have resulted in the ocean sending "visitors" to the station.

The visitors are highly personalized to Kelvin and the two men still there Jüri Järvet and Anatoly Solonitsyn , and conjured from the recesses of their minds.

In the case of the others, the visitors are so embarrassing they don't want anyone else to see them. In the case of Kelvin, it's his dead wife Natalya Bondarchuk , who on Earth poisoned herself after their relationship deteriorated.

Is the ocean creating these beings out of some malevolent intention? Once Kelvin figures out it's not really his wife from a few subtle clues, the non-functional buttons on her dress and a fact she knows one of the scientists but obviously couldn't know him , he reacts with fear, tricking her into a rocket and blasting her into space.

However, as the visitors are simply re-spawned when the men sleep, she soon returns, and over time gradually becomes closer and closer to the original.

In producing these visitors, is the ocean trying to communicate with humanity in the only way it can?

If so, it's doing a better job of it than the other way around, because after decades of study, one scientist simply bombards the ocean with high radiation X-rays, a classic human response - blind, simplistic, and possibly lethal.

Is the ocean a type of God, capable of creation? And perhaps a God, as author Stanis? If you're looking for clear answers or a lot of action for that matter , this is not the science-fiction movie for you.

In fact, part of its point is to ponder the limits of mankind's understanding. It does this while at the same time reminding us of the need to focus within, understanding mankind and oneself, at least as much as outer space, and creatures we find there.

We need a mirror," one says. Isn't it interesting that they go all that way out into space, find this vast sentient creature that they can't understand, and then end up dealing with things from their own minds?

The film also explores the most human of truths. Life is transient, and loss is inevitable - the loss of one's parents, of one's childhood home, of one's loved ones, and of course, of oneself - everything ultimately has its time and passes.

It explores the nature of love, and what it means to be happy, even if happiness is artificially created.

There is a sentimental and highly personal feeling to the film, amplified by Kelvin's introspection, and not seeing much of the other men's visitors.

In the face of all these weighty questions, I absolutely loved this exchange: Dr. Snaut: "When man is happy, the meaning of life and other eternal themes rarely interest him.

These questions should be asked at the end of one's life. That's why we're in such a hurry. Snaut: "Don't rush. The happiest people are those who are not interested in these cursed questions.

The scene where she is automatically resuscitated at one point is fantastic. I also liked the brief weightless scene, which had such a lovely ethereal quality to it.

I've read that author Stanis? One of the flaws in Lem's book that Tarkovsky wisely avoided was too much of the various debates from different camps of scientists studying Solaris over the years.

The mind boggles at how long this film might have been had he included it, and the resulting tedium. On the other hand, Tarkovsky's film is flawed as well, in that he is far too deliberate in some of his shots, such as the much-commented-on drive through tunnels in Japan, and several others, mostly in part one.

I think his point may have been to show us these things for long enough that we actually start seeing them in another way, as if for the first time, like how we may see something alien for the first time, or may ponder the big questions in life.

Regardless, he goes too far, irritating some viewers and causing others to doze off. Even for a film that is highly introspective and philosophical, which probably calls for some of this, pace is an issue here.

My advice is to keep an open mind, caffeinate yourself, and stick with it. Antonius B Super Reviewer.

Apr 29, Andrei Tarkovsky's Solaris is a masterwork of Science Fiction cinema that ranks up there with some of the finest in the genre.

Solaris is a simple idea, but the way it's handled is exceptional. In Tarkovsky's hands, the subject is grand, and the result is bold, Sci Fi epic that is visually stunning and brilliantly acted.

The film is breathtaking in its execution and director Andrei Tarkovsky vision is uncompromising and he delivers a picture that is a definite classic of the genre, one that is ambitious in its ideas and it is a movie is unforgettable.

I said that the idea is quite simple, and it is, but the way the concept is expressed on-screen, it makes for a truly engrossing form of storytelling and with phenomenal set designs, So0laris is truly a beautiful looking film.

This picture should be seen by any film lover that wants a truly compelling story mixed with stunning visuals. One of the reasons that Solaris stands out among other Science Fiction films is that it uses the bare necessitates to create something grand, and the end result is a flawless piece of cinema that ranks among one of the finest Science Fiction films ever made.

While using a simple plot, director Andrei Tarkovsky was able to get the most out of the film by focusing on a unique style that is simple unforgettable.

This film is a must watch for any genre fan, and I highly recommend it to viewers who are looking for a truly grand film to watch, then Solaris is that film.

Solaris is a truly unique picture to watch, relying and terrific visuals to elevate its story, and boasting phenomenal performances from its cast; it has earned its place among the genres finest works, and is like its contemporaries a ground breaking effort in Science Fiction cinema.

Alex r Super Reviewer. Aug 14, I can make that joke now, but back in , discussions regarding the Russians winning some kind of a space race were all too real, and apparently not even the Russians were taking too kindly to their leaders' questionable actions, as this film tells you I think.

Sorry, but this film is a touch too dull to be consistently engaging, but still, the point is that this film kind of toned down all of the excitement of the Cold War, and not just because it offered some good old-fashioned sci-fi escapism, yet hardly anyone saw it, partly for political reasons and largely because they didn't feel like promoting a film this slow all that much.

Seriously though, by , if the Russians topped the Americans in no other type of space race, it was the race to see if you could make a space film that is duller than " A Space Odyssey".

No, "" was good, and this film is just fine, but hey, you've got to give credit to the Soviets for their having the guts to make things longer and drier Oh man, as much as Russia was trying to make everyone Communist, we probably should have paid attention to this film back in '72, as you couldn't have been too sure that the Soviets meant nothing by their giving the French a piece of Russian "entertainment" that you know they were going to love, what with its being all foreign, and arty, and, well, dull.

Forced jokes regarding long-gone political conflicts aside, this is very much a critic's art flick, complete with a questionable beat for most every strength.

I go and on joking about how this film rips off " A Space Odyssey" or something, but this film appears to not want to be too derivative of the Kubrick classic in question, so much so that it ends up being derivative of other sci-fi films along these lines, having more than a few refreshing moments, but also plenty of moments that are too formulaic to keep predictability at bay, especially when predictability goes reinforced by a degree of superficiality.

The film holds a great deal of potential for depth, and it does this potential a fair bit of justice more often than not, yet I can't help but feel as though there's something undercooked about this drama, which explores much of its dramatic and thematic weight rather superficially, maybe even heavy-handedly, while putting only so much more beyond the minimum of attention into expository depth, thus making for a film that could have been deeper, but ends up taking a long time to say only so much, and I really do mean a long time.

At about two hours and a quarter, this film asks for quite the investment of time, and I can't say that it pays off as much as it should, bloating itself with excess material and repetition, but not entirely, as the film is just as dragged out by those classic artsy meditations upon nothing for overlong period of time, which boast a moderate air of pretense, and take the film's narrative down a more unconventional path that doesn't really break from the conventional as organically as it should, resulting in unevenness in storytelling style.

To be honest, by biggest fear when entering this film was not necessarily its being slow, but its specifically being slow in that artistically misguided fashion that the critics love in European films for the sake of seeming like intellectuals, rather than misguided by their own right, and I'm very relieved to find that this film keeps its artistry under control enough to keep engagement value and decency going, though I would be more comfortable with the final product if it didn't still get carried away and uneven with its meditativeness, which would, in turn, be easier to forgive if director Andrei Tarkovsky's atmospheric pacing wasn't faithful to plotting's structural pacing.

On top of being draggy, the film is very dry, with a chilled atmosphere that is pretty bland, if not just downright dull, and, believe it or not, borderline consistent, and for a whopping minutes no less.

The film is rarely so cold that it's tedious, but it challenges your investment with bland spell, after bland spell, after bland spell, dragged out by overly steady plot structuring, and rendered barely worthy of your upmost patience by conventional and often superficial storytelling, thus making for a final product which runs a very real risk of collapse into underwhelmingness.

Well, as what may very well be sheer luck may have it, the final product prevails as genuinely decent, taking a lot of damage, but meeting its blows with undeniable strengths that can be as light as strong musicality.

Now, when I say that this film is quiet, oh boy, do I mean it, so much so that the film does only so much exploring of Eduard Artemyev's score, which also gets to be too somber to be all that striking at times, but is still worthy of appreciation when it does finally come into play, as Artemyev's fusion of electronic style and tastefully minimalist classical sensibilities is both unique and lovely, as well as complimentary to the tone of this very arty sci-fi flick.

On an audible level, Artemyev unevenly used efforts breathe quite a bit of life into the film, and on a visual level, cinematographer Vadim Yusov's efforts are about as impressive, having more flat moments than the snooty critics would like to admit, but still plenty of moments that strike with a rather dated, but still warm kick to color, explored pretty deeply with nifty plays with nifty color palettes that range from handsome to borderline stunning.

The film looks good, and when it actually produces some kind of a musical note, it sounds good, so in terms of artistry that extends beyond storytelling style, this film excels about as much as it can to be a relatively cheep earlys atrt piece, yet is hardly stylistically sharp enough for artistry to be enough to carry the final product to the decency that is ultimately achieved.

What really saves the integrity of this seriously flawed film is the substance that gets hit the most by flaws, - which range from conventional and uneven storytelling to bland dragging - but is not so watered down that its potential is completely obscured, because as superficial as this film gets to be with its handling of dramatic and thematic weight, the depths of this story concept are still pretty fascinating, touching upon very human subject matter in a manner that would be more effective if the film's storytelling was more inspired, or at least more focused, but remains pretty thought-provoking.

Director Andrei Tarkovsky stands to be more extensive as the teller of this interesting tale, or at least stands to be livelier, seeing as how the intrigue of this film goes challenged by some serious bland spells, but Tarkovsky doesn't get so carried away with his misguided artistry or other shortcomings that you can deny a certain degree of immediate intrigue, spawned from a weighty story concept, and reinforced engaging performances.

Retrieved June 4, Retrieved June 14, Film Threat. The Orange County Register. The Seattle Times. Contact Music. Why filmmakers use pseudonyms".

Welkos November 5, Times Staff Writer. The Los Angeles Times. Welkos November 15, Solaris DVD audio commentary track. Rotten Tomatoes.

Retrieved April 4, The Hollywood Reporter. August 19, Retrieved January 28, Our Critics Weigh In". The A. Retrieved April 3, Time Out Film Guide.

Archived from the original on January 9, NYT Critics' Pick. The New York Times. Retrieved August 10, Chicago Sun-Times. Top 10 Hollywood Remakes.

Retrieved January 7, Archived from the original on January 8, Retrieved March 18, Steven Soderbergh. Filmography Bibliography.

Nightwatch Criminal Section Eight Productions. James Cameron. Filmography Unrealized projects Awards and nominations. Solaris Korzenie s Do You Exist, Mr.

Cyberiada opera Solaris play. Lymphater Lem's robots Trurl and Klapaucius. Hidden categories: Webarchive template webcite links Use mdy dates from April Template film date with 1 release date All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from June Articles containing potentially dated statements from April All articles containing potentially dated statements Duration without hAudio microformat Articles with hAudio microformats Album infoboxes lacking a cover Album articles lacking alt text for covers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WorldCat-VIAF identifiers.

Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Download as PDF Printable version.

Soundtracks Film music.

Mi-a placut mult Natascha McElhone, una dintre actritele mele preferate, intr-un rol care-i vine manusa, la fel ca si cel din "Surviving Picasso" Iar actorul din rolul fizicianului e foarte simpatic.

Nu stiu, fac parte din generatia aceea care a auzit atitea despre Tarkovski in special de la barbosi care cad pe spate cind ii pronunta numele sau de la fete "boeme" cu parul nespalat , incit s-a saturat de el inainte de a-i vedea filmele.

Nu compar si nu vreau sa compar si ma bucur ca nu compar - astfel cel putin, acest "Solaris" e excelent. MiB pe 02 Noiembrie Daca la capitolul intelegere stai la fel ca la capitolul gramatica se intelege de ce nu ai prins ideea acestui film.

Pana si poezia faimoasa a lui Dylon Thomas pare sa fac parte din identitatea filmului, imprimandu-i acestuia un anumit ritm, si conexand momentele cheie din film.

Beastmaster pe 22 Septembrie E greu sa intelegi ceva in timpurile astea daca faci parte din "generatia viteza" Abia peste 31 de ani s-a descoperit prima planeta din afara sistemului nostru solar.

Intelegeti de ce sint de invidiat si trebuie respectati cei care si-au imaginat alte planete cu multe decenii inainte de a sti daca chiar exista altele in afara celor ce se invirt in jurul Soarelui nostru?

La ora la care scriu acest comentariu se cunosc pozitiile precise ale mai mult de de planete in afara sistemului nostru solar.

Doar in galaxia noastra se estimeaza azi un numar de de miliarde de planete pe baza ultimelor rezultate. Matrix pe 18 Noiembrie Sf-uri-le mi-au placut intotdeauna si pot spune ca acest film este unul reusit chiar daca nu l-am vazut.

Spikos pe 26 Martie Am vazut "Solaris" ; nu sunt fan al filmelor S. Daca ne uitam la Solaris vedem ca mai mult decorul e S.

Iulidesprefilme pe 21 Februarie Click aici pentru a te autentifica. Liste cu Solaris. Filme psihologice care merita vazute. HBO Postere Solaris.

George Clooney Kris Kelvin. Cancel Resend Email. Solaris Add Article. Solaris Critics Consensus Solaris is a haunting, meditative film that uses sci-fi to raise complex questions about humanity and existence.

See score details. Rate And Review Submit review Want to see. Super Reviewer. Rate this movie Oof, that was Rotten. What did you think of the movie?

Step 2 of 2 How did you buy your ticket? Let's get your review verified. Fandango AMCTheatres. More Info. Submit By opting to have your ticket verified for this movie, you are allowing us to check the email address associated with your Rotten Tomatoes account against an email address associated with a Fandango ticket purchase for the same movie.

How did you buy your ticket? View All Photos Movie Info. A psychologist is sent to a space station orbiting a planet called Solaris to investigate the death of a doctor and the mental problems of cosmonauts on the station.

He soon discovers that the water on the planet is a type of brain which brings out repressed memories and obsessions. Andrei Tarkovsky. Viacheslav Tarasov.

Jan 9, Unit Four. Natalya Bondarchuk Khari. Donatas Banionis Kris Kelvin. Jüri Järvet Dr. Vladislav Dvorzhetskiy Berton.

Nikolay Grinko Kelvin's father. Anatoliy Solonitsyn Dr. Sos Sargsyan Dr. Olga Barnet Mother. Aleksandr Misharin Shanahan. Andrei Tarkovsky Director.

Fridrikh Gorenshteyn Writer Screenplay. Stanislaw Lem Writer Novel. Andrei Tarkovsky Writer Screenplay. Viacheslav Tarasov Producer.

Eduard Artemev Original Music. Vadim Yusov Cinematographer. Lyudmila Feyginova Film Editor. Mikhail Romadin Production Designer. May 18, Full Review….

June 16, Full Review…. May 23, Full Review…. May 30, Full Review…. February 9, Full Review…. October 29, Full Review…. August 1, Full Review….

February 7, Full Review…. View All Critic Reviews Aug 22, Kris Kelvin Donatas Banionis arrives at a station hovering above the planet Solaris, which has been studied and debated for years.

Its life form, essentially the planet's vast ocean, is very different from anything else encountered or conceived.

It seems intelligent, but its actions and the swirling, fantastic structures it can create are hard to decipher. There are new developments following some rogue experiments on the part of some scientists stationed there, which have resulted in the ocean sending "visitors" to the station.

The visitors are highly personalized to Kelvin and the two men still there Jüri Järvet and Anatoly Solonitsyn , and conjured from the recesses of their minds.

In the case of the others, the visitors are so embarrassing they don't want anyone else to see them. In the case of Kelvin, it's his dead wife Natalya Bondarchuk , who on Earth poisoned herself after their relationship deteriorated.

Is the ocean creating these beings out of some malevolent intention? Once Kelvin figures out it's not really his wife from a few subtle clues, the non-functional buttons on her dress and a fact she knows one of the scientists but obviously couldn't know him , he reacts with fear, tricking her into a rocket and blasting her into space.

However, as the visitors are simply re-spawned when the men sleep, she soon returns, and over time gradually becomes closer and closer to the original.

In producing these visitors, is the ocean trying to communicate with humanity in the only way it can? If so, it's doing a better job of it than the other way around, because after decades of study, one scientist simply bombards the ocean with high radiation X-rays, a classic human response - blind, simplistic, and possibly lethal.

Is the ocean a type of God, capable of creation? And perhaps a God, as author Stanis? If you're looking for clear answers or a lot of action for that matter , this is not the science-fiction movie for you.

In fact, part of its point is to ponder the limits of mankind's understanding. It does this while at the same time reminding us of the need to focus within, understanding mankind and oneself, at least as much as outer space, and creatures we find there.

We need a mirror," one says. Isn't it interesting that they go all that way out into space, find this vast sentient creature that they can't understand, and then end up dealing with things from their own minds?

The film also explores the most human of truths. Life is transient, and loss is inevitable - the loss of one's parents, of one's childhood home, of one's loved ones, and of course, of oneself - everything ultimately has its time and passes.

It explores the nature of love, and what it means to be happy, even if happiness is artificially created.

There is a sentimental and highly personal feeling to the film, amplified by Kelvin's introspection, and not seeing much of the other men's visitors.

In the face of all these weighty questions, I absolutely loved this exchange: Dr. Snaut: "When man is happy, the meaning of life and other eternal themes rarely interest him.

An appalled Rheya abandons the meeting. Kelvin confronts Gordon, who in turn chastises him for getting emotionally involved with something that is not really human and may eventually pose a threat to human beings on the station as well as on Earth.

Later, apparently during a dream, Kelvin has a vision of Gibarian, and asks him what Solaris wants. Gibarian balks at the idea of knowing an alien entity's motivations, or even that it might have motivations, and tells Kelvin simply that "there are no answers, only choices".

Kelvin wakes to find that Rheya has killed herself. Soon afterward, she self-resurrects, and it is revealed that other manifestations who have "died" had done the same.

Gordon develops an apparatus which can permanently destroy a replica but Kelvin objects to using it on Rheya. Driven by his own grief and guilt over the "real" Rheya's death on Earth, he begins ingesting a chemical stimulant to stay awake in order to monitor Rheya, trying to avoid repeating the past and essentially abandoning her to suicide.

Kelvin eventually falls asleep and Rheya successfully petitions Gordon to destroy her with the apparatus as she has done for her own replica s.

Traumatized, Kelvin confronts Dr. Gordon who maintains she merely facilitated in assisted suicide and only strives for the preservation of the humans on the station.

Kelvin and Gordon then discover a dead body stashed away in a ceiling vent in the station's cold room — Snow.

The Snow they have been interacting with is a replica. Confronted by Gordon and Kelvin, the Snow replica explains that upon being dreamed into existence, he was attacked by the real Snow and thus killed him in self-defense.

He goes on to tell them that repeat usage of the apparatus has drained the ship's fuel cell reactor, making a return trip to Earth impossible.

Furthermore, Solaris has begun to exponentially increase its mass, thereby gravitationally pulling the space station inexorably toward the planet.

Gordon and Kelvin begin prepping a smaller space vehicle called Athena to escape. Back on Earth, Kelvin struggles to return to normal life, haunted by the idea that he "remembered her wrong" — that is, Rheya as being invariably suicidal.

When he accidentally cuts his finger in his kitchen, the wound immediately heals, and it is then that Kelvin realizes that he never returned to Earth.

In a flashback, Kelvin gives up the idea of boarding the lifeboat, and Doctor Gordon leaves him behind. As the plummeting space station rattles itself to pieces around him, the replica of Gibarian's young son appears and offers his hand in assistance.

In the kitchen, Rheya appears to Kelvin yet again. This time, however, she is tranquil, and assures Kelvin that they no longer have to think in terms like "life" and "death," and that all they have ever done is forgiven.

For a while, James Cameron was looking to remake Solaris. Cameron was thrilled with what he heard and development began on the project.

Using both the film and the book as reference, the script allowed him to dig into various themes and subjects he wasn't able to come to terms with in his earlier films.

Since George Clooney was Soderbergh's producing partner, having formed Section Eight Productions together in , Soderbergh was obligated to send Clooney a copy of the Solaris script.

Because both Soderbergh and Clooney had prior commitments at the time, the film did not enter production until close to mid Following a week of filming exteriors, the crew moved to the Warner Bros.

In addition to fulfilling the roles of director and screenwriter, Soderbergh also acted as the film's cinematographer and editor, both of which were credited under pseudonyms.

A few weeks prior to the film's release, in early November , the Motion Picture Association of America assigned the film an R rating primarily due to two scenes that depicted Clooney's naked backside.

Twelve days prior to the film's release, an appeals board overturned the R-rating for a PG rating. The consensus states "Slow-moving, cerebral, and ambiguous, Solaris is not a movie for everyone, but it offers intriguing issues to ponder.

The absence of boyish friskiness, kineticism and pyrotechnics makes it a film that offers no vicarious physical release.

Its insistence on remaining cerebral and somber to the end may be a sign of integrity, but it should cost it dearly at the box office.

It was slow, mysterious, confusing, and I have never forgotten it. Soderbergh's version is more clean and spare, more easily readable, but it pays full attention to the ideas and doesn't compromise.

Tarkovsky was a genius, but one who demanded great patience from his audience as he ponderously marched toward his goals. The Soderbergh version is like the same story freed from the weight of Tarkovsky's solemnity.

And it evokes one of the rarest of movie emotions, ironic regret. Soderbergh "said that he didn't intend Solaris to be a remake of Tarkovsky's film but rather a new version of Stanislaw Lem's novel".

As Solaris' author I shall allow myself to repeat that I only wanted to create a vision of a human encounter with something that certainly exists , in a mighty manner perhaps, but cannot be reduced to human concepts, ideas or images.

This is why the book was entitled "Solaris" and not "Love in Outer Space". In , Solaris made Time magazine's "Top 10 Hollywood Remakes" list, saying it was "expertly and exquisitely executed" and "manages to extract that all too rare achievement from a sci-fi film: emotion.

The score was composed by Cliff Martinez in [28] and first released by Superb Records on Compact Disc in [29]. After being out of print, it was re-released in a remastered edition in January by La-La Land Records [30].

Solaris Imdb

Solaris Imdb
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Kommentare zu „Solaris Imdb

  • 27.12.2019 um 14:35
    Permalink

    Ich denke, dass Sie sich irren. Ich biete es an, zu besprechen.

    Antworten
  • 29.12.2019 um 14:50
    Permalink

    Es war und mit mir. Geben Sie wir werden diese Frage besprechen. Hier oder in PM.

    Antworten

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert.